Option Focus | CoreWeave’s $1.37 Million Double-Put Bet on 75/80 Strikes Signals Bearish Conviction, While Call Calendar Spread Adds Cautious Upside Positioning

Option Witch
Sep 24

CoreWeave closed at $86.90, registering a 0.16% change, with intraday prices spanning $86.55 to $90.36 and volume reaching approximately 31.67 million shares.

Options flow showed a distinctly cautious tone, headlined by a $1.37 million double-put purchase at the 75.00 and 80.00 strikes expiring October 2026, which signaled conviction in a material downside move. A separate $443,500.00 call calendar-style spread across October and November 2026 reflected a defined-risk, volatility-focused view on capped upside rather than outright bullish positioning.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

CoreWeave’s implied volatility stands at 77.99%, while its IV percentile is just 5.98%, which indicates that despite the high absolute IV level, current option pricing sits near the low end of its own historical volatility range. In other words, volatility is on the low side relative to where CoreWeave options have typically traded, so options appear cheaply priced rather than expensive. With an IV/HV ratio of 1.11, implied volatility is running modestly above realized volatility, suggesting the market is assigning a slight premium to forward uncertainty but not to an extreme degree.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 3.72.

Large Trades

A call calendar-style spread package with a $443,500.00 net debit stood out as one of the day’s key complex trades. This four-leg cross-expiration call combination bought the 110.0 calls expiring 2026-11-20 and bought the 140.0 calls expiring 2026-10-16, while selling the 140.0 calls expiring 2026-11-20 and selling the 110.0 calls expiring 2026-10-16, all with both strikes currently out of the money versus the $86.90 reference stock price. As a spread strategy, its size should be read from the provided net debit rather than gross leg sums, and the structure suggests a volatility- and term-structure-focused positioning rather than a simple outright directional wager. The trader appears to be using a cross-expiration call spread to express a defined-risk view on how upside optionality will evolve between October and November, likely seeking favorable relative pricing across maturities while maintaining upside exposure within a capped framework.

A directional put-buying package with a $1.37 million net debit was the more overtly bearish featured trade. This same-direction double-put combination bought 3,000 contracts of the 80.0 puts and 3,000 contracts of the 75.0 puts, both expiring 2026-10-16, with both strikes currently out of the money. Because the structure includes multiple bought puts, it is best viewed as a bearish spread-style volatility bet funded entirely through premium outlay, aimed at profiting from a sizable downside move into expiration. The dual-strike put purchases indicate conviction that CRWV could break materially lower, while also layering exposure across two downside levels to capture an accelerated selloff rather than merely hedge a mild pullback. Overall, the bulk-order flow points clearly bearish: the heaviest premium concentration leaned to call selling and downside put accumulation, while the showcased complex trades reinforce caution rather than optimism. Taken together, the large-trade profile suggests institutional participants are positioned for restrained upside and a meaningful risk of downside pressure in CRWV.

Strategy Reference

For a low assignment probability in this elevated-IV environment, a seller could consider the 60.00 put expiring 2026-10-16, which sits well below the featured 75.00/80.00 downside cluster and provides a wider cushion; alternatively, a put credit spread such as selling the 75.00 put and buying the 65.00 put with the same expiration reduces margin requirements while still aligning with the cautious tape.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10